Factors That Shape a Child’s Personality

Factors That turn a Childs recordThere is a development interest in factors that influences and shapes a barbarians record, genetics and environmental factors be the two well-nigh prominent factors that ar rising in debates. Personality theorist much(prenominal) as Sigmund Freud supports genetic factors and that it encounters a commodious role in determine a babes constitution objet dart Alfred Adler supports environmental factors that dominate in shaping the personality of a nestling. However, there be early(a) studies and research that indicates genetic and environmental factors argon both essential in building the personality of the fry. The personality of the p atomic number 18nts and the peasant reciprocates with each other to build a to a greater extent than than unequivocal parent- boor dealing depending on the situations and environments.Personality is the fundamental expression of feelings and emotions through bodily organizations, intelligences as we ll as special capacity as defined by Rue (2008). This is back up by Allport (1961), where he stated that personality is an several(prenominal)s characteristic patterns whereby it is inactive throughout an separates development. oer the past few decades, increased studies take up shown that genetics and environmental factors get down an impact on a squirts behaviour (Rutter, 2006). integrity of such theories was provided by Sigmund Freuds psychosexual development, where he supported the factors of spirit in shaping a claws personality during their also soon years. Human sexual tone does not start at pubescence but it begins soon after origin, with clear manifestations (Kline, 2014). Yet, there are fence personality theorists who believed that the personality of an individual is shaped through interactions with the environment and the tidy sum around them. Examples are Costa and McCraes five factor type where personality of individuals are categorised as openness to experiences, conscientiousness, extraversion, amenity as well as psychoneurosis and Alfred Adlers theory on birth orders, where birth orders of an individual in the family bequeath affect their personality.Child inclination is one of the most prominent genetic factor that shapes a kidskins personality. It poop be defined as the fundamental root for affective arousal, expression and regulation components of personality (Goldsmith et al, 1987). Temperamental traits begins in primeval babyhood and go forth be stabilized across judgment of conviction and it is the grassroots elements for later personality development (Coplan, Reichel Rowan, 2009). Children with difficult disposition entrust spend a penny a graduate(prenominal)er persistency to withdraw in connecting with new environments and muckle and they are more pessimistic and have ban emotionality (Laukkanen et al, 2014). For example, coyness is regarded as the temperamental tiltency to experience fear and an xiety and they endure to exhibit more negative emotions and are inclined to the developing of midland problems (Coplan, Reichel Rowan, 2009). Therefore, when they are interacting with the societies and they are more in all probability to stimulate protective and everyplace controlling responses from their parents or caregivers (Coplan, Reichel Rowan, 2009).One of such personality theorist, Sigmund Freud, believed that the fundamental personality was formed by events and things that happened in the first 6 years of life of an individual (Carroll, 2010). Carroll (2010) in addition stated that Freud classified a disparate erogenous zone where libidinal dynamism was directed and if that interpret failed to cope, the libidinal energy lead remained in that particular zone, leading to the pincer experiencing a retroversion. erogenous zones refers to areas of the body where they are mellowly sensitive to touch and are cerebrate to sexual pleasures. Freuds psychosexual devel opment consisted of oral, anal, phallic and genital arcdegrees as analysed by Carroll (2010).Oral introduce is known as the first stage of psychosexual development and it lasts for the first eighteen months of a human life, exposit by Carroll (2010). According to him, it is a stage where the mouth, lips and tongue are the first erogenous zone. Garcia (1995) explained that during this stage, draws are the ones who have the most direct communication with the child and the mothers should attend to the child without implementing anxiety in the child. In accordance to Freuds theory, complications and dispute in this stage could result in oral fixation and his could lead to behaviours such overeating, smoking and alcohol abuse (Carroll, 2010). The subsequence stage volition be the anal stage where the anal area is the mere(a) erogenous zone and it is the period where children begins with their toilet training where the child begins to guide the practical life slighton of how and when to let go and hold on to original things and events (Carroll, 2010 Garcia, 1995). Carroll (2010) stated that failure in this stage could result in traits such as stubbornness, cleanliness and orderliness. The following stage, namely the phallic stage according to Freud, is the most critical period where it occurs between three to six years old. Carroll (2010) explained that Freud believed that during this stage, boys will undergo the Oedipus complex, while girls will undergo Electra complex and develop extremity envy. He in addition described that oedipus complex is where a male child has sexual attraction for his mother and electra complex is where female child has incestuous desire for her father. However, before this stage ends, the male and female child will distinguish with parents of the same sex and embraces its masculine and feminine characteristics (Carroll, 2010). Superego from Freuds analytic thinking theory where he emphasise on unconscious mind in humans, will also being to establish around the same time and most children will take up the values of their parents (Carroll,2010). He also suggested that before entering puberty, the child will go through response time stage where libido in inverted and contained (Garcia, 1995). Carroll (2010) indicated that during this stage, sexual interest are supressed and children during this stage will play with others of the same sex. Garcia (1995) suggested that educations from caregiver and role model can help the children to learn more about the importance and the responsibilities of self-govern, self-expressions and its consequences. During puberty, the child will enter the last stage of psychosexual development, the genital stage whereby the child will develop the ability to adopt adult sexual behaviours and in this stage, libido is to be directed to an object that is significantly different from those childhood sexual urge (Carroll, 2010).Genetics differences in individuals personality are whol ly predispositions to behaves in certain paths, conversely to the environmental factors that may suggest that different children with the similar predisposition in a different directions (Keogh, 2003). One paramount environmental factor is the parenting style and it has been seen as a fairly stable contributions to childrearing practices. Parenting style is characterized as parents behaviours and their interactions with their child over different situations, creating the interactional climate for parent-child relatives (Laukkanen et al, 2014). Crockenberg et al (2008) indicated that maternal behaviour play a key role in developing childrens fear behaviour, personality and externalising trajectories. Fromm (2013) supported this by explaining that one of the essential factors in shaping a childs personality is the relatedness to the childs mother and how the mother behaves will influence the childs behaviour and personality. He also stated that Freud had dreams about his mother and it implies that as a child, he wanted to be fed by his mother, this symbolises as being cared for, love and protected by his mother. If a child is being neglected and not fed by its caregiver, the child will grow impatient and unwarranted as he or she feels that they have the right to immediate and complete attention (Fromm, 2013).Belsky and Barends (2002) claimed that the Five Factor Model (FFM), namely openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neurosis, by Costa and McCrae is the basic framework with regards to parents personality and the quality of parent-child relation. For example, neuroticism refers to individuals who have a high tendency to experience negative emotions such as anxiety, hostility and more important emotionally instability (Vondra Belsky, 1993). Parents who urinate higher(prenominal) in neuroticism are more anxious and are more likely to embrace an overprotective style of parenting because of their tendencies to identify th reats to their child in the environment (Coplan, Reichel Rowan, 2009). They also indicated that parents who score higher in neuroticism are unlikely to be responsive and displaying warm in parenting. On the other hand, agreeableness in individuals are reflected through their interpersonal skills, they can range from compassionate, trustworthy and being helpful to highly irritable and utilization on others (Coplan, Reichel Rowan, 2009). Coplan, Reichel and Rowan (2009) also explained that mothers who are high in agreeableness exhibit more parental warmth and are highly responsive. collect to the tendencies to give in, agreeable parents will more likely to give in to their child, leading to a more harmonious parent-child dealinghips (Denissen, Aken Dubas, 2009). Extraversion is correlated with a higher aim of lordly effects and parents that score higher in extraversion are more likely to have a positive relationship with their child (Denissen, Aken Dubas, 2009). Belsky and B erends (2002) support this by stating that parents who are high in extraversion are more sensitive and responsive to their child. Parents who are high in conscientiousness are said to have a higher level of control over their own lives and therefore they are less regulated by the family rules, there are also evidences that suggest that parents with high level of conscientiousness are correlated with higher quality of parent-child relation (Denissen, Aken Dubas, 2009). Lastly, they also indicated that parents who are high in openness to experience are found to have a positive relationship with their child as they are less restrictive towards their child due to them having a broader and more permeable conscientiousness. Personalities of parents have significant correlations with the personality of the child as supported by Kochanska, Friesenborg, Lange and Martel (2004), they stated that parents who are more agreeable have infants who are more able to focus their attention and more f earful while parents who are more empathic have infants who are better centre and less prone to anger and parents who are more open have infants that are more joyful. Laukkanen et al (2014) also indicated that parents who show high level of psychological control towards their child, will lead to the child developing a more maladaptive outcomes such as having trim self-esteem and lower academic performances.Another environmental factor is the birth order of the child and personality among blood relatives that was highly emphasized by Alfred Adler. Leman (2009) also pointed out that parental values are powerful factors that can affect every child in the family, especially the firstborns. Sulloway (2011) support birth order by conducting a study where adults were asked to compare their personality traits with their siblings. He found out that firstborns tend to be more achieving and conscientious while the laterborns tend to be more rebellious an open. Leman (2009) emphasized that f irstborns are more reliable and they tend to specialise right and wrong and believe that there is a right way to accomplish things. He also stated that firstborns are natural leadership and oft tend to be achievement oriented. Whereby the nerve child will more likely to be contradictory of the child before them in the family and they are often loyal and competitive (Leman, 2009). Leman (2009) also suggested that being the middle child, they are not expected to accomplish as much as those who are born before them and they are often the negotiator of the family who tries to persist in the peace. As for the lastborns, Leman (2009) describe them as sociable, outgoing, spontaneous and humorous and they are often the most pampered ones in the family. However, being the youngest would mean that they are most likely to be picked on by other members in the family (Leman, 2009). He also stated that the entire family and its environment will change when a child is born and how the parents behaves and act towards the child will determine a bully part in the childs destiny. Leman (2009) stressed that a childs personality depends largely on the personality and the parenting style of the parents. If parents are to controlling and applied too much stress or too unreasonable towards the firstborns, they can turn the child to a rebel who will messes up just to agitate the parents instead of excelling in their academic (Leman, 2009).To conclude, reputation and nurture come together in many ways in shaping a childs personalities (Bates Pettit, 2007). Those children whose personalities and temperaments are in conflicts with ethnic norms and parental expectations have a higher tendency to evoke negative reactions from others and in turn, parents will become more controlling and adopting a more authoritarian parenting style (Maccoby, 2007). In some cases, the personalities of children and parents may have a lot of resemblance as they will mimic each other and share a portio n of the same genes that will affect their temperament (Denissen, Aken Dubas, 2009). Therefore, shaping the personality of the child is mostly depending on the reciprocal relations and interactions between the parents and the child. For example, happy and easy infants will have a positive and responsive relationship with their parents and also, affecting ambience in mothers will to a fault have positive and consistent relationship with fearful infants as mothers tend to be more protective towards fearful infants (Kochanska, Friesenborg, Lange Martel, 2004).ReferencesAllport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S. (2007). Temperament, Parenting, and Socialization. In J. Gausec P. Hastings. In Handbook of Socialization (pp. 153-177). New York Guilford.Belsky, J., Barends, N. (2002). Personality and parenting (2nd ed., Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum M. H. Bornstein.Carroll, J. (2010). Sexuality Now Embracing D iversity. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Coplan, R. J., Reichel, M., Rowan, K. (2009). Exploring the associations between maternal personality, child temperament, and parenting A focus on emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 241246.Crockenberg, S. C., Leerkes, E. M., Barrig Jo, P. S. (2008). Predicting aggressive way in the third year from infant reactivity and regulation as moderated by maternal behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 37-54.Denissen, J. J., Aken, M. A., Dubas, J. S. (2009). It Takes Two to Tango How Parents and Adolescents Personalities Link to the superior of Their Mutual Relationship. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 928941.Fromm, E. (2013). Sigmund Freuds Mission An Analysis of his Personality and Influence. Open pathway Media.Garcia, J. L. (1995). Freuds Psychosexual Stage Conception A Developmental Metaphor for Counselors. daybook of Counseling Development, 73, 498-502.Goldsmith, H. H., Buss, A. H., Plomin, R., Rothbart, M. K., Thom as, A., Chess, S., al, e. (1987). Roundtable What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Development, 58, 505529.Grazyna, K., Amanda, E. F., Lindsey, A. L., Michelle, M. M. (n.d.).Keogh, B. (2003). Temperament In The Classroom Understanding Individual Differences. United States, Baltimore Bethesda.Kline, P. (2014). Fact and Fantasy in Freudian Theory. New York Routledge.Kochanska, G., Friesenborg, A. E., Lange, L. A., Martel, M. M. (2004). Personality Processes and Individual Differences Parents Personality and Infants Temperament as Contributors to Their Emerging Relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 744759.Laukkanen, J., Ojansuu, U., Tolvanen, A., Alatupa, S., Aunola, K. (2014). Childs thorny Temperament and Mothers Parenting Styles. J Child Family Study, 23, 312323.Leman, K. (2009). The birth order book wherefore you are the way you are. Grand Rapids MI Revell.Maccoby, E. E. (2007). Historical Overview of Socialization investigate and Theory. I n J. E. Grusec, P. D. Hastings, Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 13-41). New York Guilford Publications.Rue, D. W. (2008, January 30). What is Prsonality? The educational Forum, 1(1), 54-59.Rutter, M. (2006). Genes and behavior Nature-nurture interplay explained. Oxford UK Blackwell.Sulloway, F. J. (2011). Why siblings are like Darwins finches Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In D. M. Buss, P. H. Hawley, The evolution of personality and individual differences. Oxford Oxford University Press.Vondra, J., Belsky, J. (1993). Developmental origins of parenting Personality and relationship factors. In T. Luster, L. Okagaki, Parenting An ecological perspective (pp. 133). Hillsdale NJ Erlbaum.