Ethical Foreign Policy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Ethical Foreign Policy - Essay typefaceIn profit a global discourse of human rights is emerging, which in turn, reflects in a large number of supranational legal instruments.2 This discourse warrants intervention where rights are being abused on a large overcome and where at the same time a global opinion in favour of democracy is observed. whereforeThis is primarily because the in time availability of information makes the issue to a greater extent sensitive since the natural under plump foring of helping in human nature is effectively activated. In addition due to a more accessible realness people and governments (representative of the people) feel themselves to be more attached with the affairs of others as they outright or indirectly affect them politically, economically or sheer as per the national morality/psyche.This move will first clarify honourable opposed indemnity. It will then examine foreign policy ethics and interests. Thirdly, it wills discuses how to cons truct estimable foreign policies in a government. Finally it will conclude that the or so important points in the study, with a recommendation for any future work.It iWhat is honourable foreign policyIt is not reflective of actual practice to posit a dichotomy between, on one hand, an ethical foreign policy, and on the other, a non-ethical foreign policy.3 The growing interaction amongst nation state at international sail has made it impossible that the action of one state is devoid of the effect on other state. This real interconnectedness of actions of one state and the effects on the other state had made it impossible to squander foreign policy which is devoid of ethical strings. However, the depth and breadth of ethical paradigms might be diametrical for different nations. Therefore, the issues are focused on rather how governments act ethically, according to certain criteria, and how they balance competing ethical claims. The governments must be pragmatic, because they c annot formulate foreign policy from a predetermined ethical standpoint.4 The pedestal of ethical standpoint has to be different for every government. The reason is that the intensity or the will to follow the ethical strings/viewpoints or even formulation of those, is directly proportional to numerous factors within the government which admit military/economic might and the resultant fall out on the nation, of the event taking place. Example That is exactly what happened in case of Iraq War. To have a nuclear weapon, if seen from ethical stand point of defend ones country, was justified from Iraqs point of view. However, US saw it as a direct threat to itself in contingent and world in general. This led US to adopt pre-emptive strategy. On the other hand many of the world nations were not interested in US strategy as they were viewing the issue from the ethical stand point of engaging and resolving issue through dialogue with Iraq. Further, the resultant expected destabilization of the component part and loss of life was not thought to be ethical enough by those nations. Reality is that US did go for the war because it had the